GRID A100A vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 March 2019 (6 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30726912
Core clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1005 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6434.2
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs192432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache768 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s1,866 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 March 2019 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 48 and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 48 or GRID A100A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.