GRID A100A vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 396 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 11.59 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega 12 | GA100 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 November 2018 (6 years ago) | 14 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 6912 |
| Core clock speed | 815 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 54,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 434.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.437 TFLOPS | 13.89 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 192 |
| TMUs | 64 | 432 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 432 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 6144 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 1,866 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 8.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2018 | 14 May 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 400 Watt |
Pro Vega 16 has 433.3% lower power consumption.
GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation card while GRID A100A is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
