Radeon RX 6900 vs Pro Vega 16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 16 with Radeon RX 6900, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 16
2018
4 GB HBM2, 75 Watt
12.47

RX 6900 outperforms Pro Vega 16 by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.2020.01
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 12Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 November 2018 (5 years ago)28 October 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244608
Core clock speed815 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate76.16606.2
Floating-point processing power2.437 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth307.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 16 12.47
RX 6900 69.52
+457%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 16 4809
RX 6900 26813
+458%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55
−445%
300−350
+445%
4K38
−453%
210−220
+453%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−450%
220−230
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−449%
450−500
+449%
Hitman 3 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−437%
220−230
+437%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−450%
220−230
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−450%
220−230
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−449%
450−500
+449%
Hitman 3 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−437%
220−230
+437%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−450%
220−230
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−448%
170−180
+448%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−449%
450−500
+449%
Hitman 3 21−24
−422%
120−130
+422%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−430%
350−400
+430%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−450%
220−230
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−456%
150−160
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−429%
180−190
+429%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Hitman 3 14−16
−433%
80−85
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Hitman 3 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−408%
300−310
+408%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

This is how Pro Vega 16 and RX 6900 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 is 445% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6900 is 453% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.47 69.52
Recency 14 November 2018 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 255 Watt

Pro Vega 16 has 240% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 457.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.