Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Pro Vega 16

Place in the ranking	396	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	72
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	47.60
Power efficiency	11.51	13.21
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Vega 12	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	14 November 2018 (6 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	815 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	76.16	304.8
Floating-point processing power	2.437 TFLOPS	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	64	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	307.2 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 16 12.47

RX 5700 XT 42.94
+244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 16 4809

RX 5700 XT 16563
+244%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro Vega 16 10569

RX 5700 XT 35823
+239%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro Vega 16 7745

RX 5700 XT 26189
+238%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro Vega 16 56273

RX 5700 XT 146093
+160%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −125%	126 +125%
1440p	21−24 −252%	74 +252%
4K	38 −21.1%	46 +21.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.17
1440p	no data	5.39
4K	no data	8.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−311%

78
+311%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −162%	76 +162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −450%	110 +450%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −398%	199 +398%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −372%	118 +372%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −311%	78 +311%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −331%	125 +331%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −247%	118 +247%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −263%	298 +263%
Hitman 3	21−24 −265%	84 +265%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −374%	313 +374%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −251%	144 +251%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −238%	115 +238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −303%	160−170 +303%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −265%	259 +265%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −431%	154 +431%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −355%	91 +355%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −313%	165 +313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −328%	107 +328%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −295%	75 +295%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −248%	101 +248%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −218%	108 +218%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −245%	283 +245%
Hitman 3	21−24 −274%	86 +274%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −345%	294 +345%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −251%	144 +251%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −185%	97 +185%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −383%	193 +383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −187%	85−90 +187%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −249%	248 +249%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −114%	62 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −290%	78 +290%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −220%	80 +220%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −253%	67 +253%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −152%	73 +152%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −80.5%	148 +80.5%
Hitman 3	21−24 −261%	83 +261%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −105%	135 +105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −328%	171 +328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27 −244%	93 +244%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +6%	67 −6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−218%

108
+218%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −425%	126 +425%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −342%	84 +342%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −342%	53 +342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −556%	59 +556%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −346%	58 +346%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −348%	273 +348%
Hitman 3	14−16 −293%	59 +293%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −316%	104 +316%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −420%	104 +420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 −495%	119 +495%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −209%	241 +209%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

−295%

79
+295%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −367%	56 +367%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −389%	44 +389%
Hitman 3	8−9 −463%	45 +463%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −105%	121 +105%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −491%	65 +491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −391%	54 +391%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −450%	33 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −450%	33 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	17 +750%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −394%	79 +394%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −545%	71 +545%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −160%	13 +160%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−264%

40
+264%

This is how Pro Vega 16 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 125% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 252% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 16 is 6% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro Vega 16 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RX 5700 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.47	42.94
Recency	14 November 2018	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt

Pro Vega 16 has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 244.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.