Radeon R7 350 vs Pro VII
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro VII with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.
Pro VII outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 194 | 667 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.42 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.73 | 7.15 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Vega 20 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 6 July 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,899 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,230 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 408.0 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 13.06 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 16 |
| TMUs | 240 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 305 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 31.57 | 5.10 |
| Recency | 13 May 2020 | 6 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 55 Watt |
Pro VII has a 519% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
R7 350, on the other hand, has 354.5% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
