GeForce 9200M vs Radeon Pro V7350X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameEllesmereC79
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1188 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate179.03.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 12 Watt

Pro V7350X2 has a 364% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 1567% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V7350X2 and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V7350X2 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V7350X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V7350X2 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.