Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs GeForce 9400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1346not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.25no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameC79Ellesmere
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed450 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistors314 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600179.0
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs8144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared7 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 200 Watt

9400M G has 1567% lower power consumption.

Pro V7350X2, on the other hand, has a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M G and Radeon Pro V7350X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V7350X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V7350X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M G or Radeon Pro V7350X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.