RTX A4500 Embedded vs Radeon Pro V620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro V620 with RTX A4500 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

Pro V620
2021
32 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
37.38
+88.4%

Pro V620 outperforms RTX A4500 Embedded by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.5919.10
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date4 November 2021 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46085888
Core clock speed1825 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate633.6223.6
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs288184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores7246
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB5.8 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro V620 37.38
+88.4%
RTX A4500 Embedded 19.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro V620 26519
+220%
Samples: 3
RTX A4500 Embedded 8295
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.38 19.84
Recency 4 November 2021 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 80 Watt

Pro V620 has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro V620 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4500 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V620 or RTX A4500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.