Steam Machine GPU vs Radeon Pro V520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.99no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 12Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2020 (4 years ago)2026

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1000 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4274.4
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS17.56 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mm156 mm
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.21.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 110 Watt

Steam Machine GPU has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 104.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V520 and Steam Machine GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation graphics card while Steam Machine GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
AMD Steam Machine GPU
Steam Machine GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Steam Machine GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V520 or Steam Machine GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.