Radeon RX 7400 vs Pro V520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.90no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 12Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2020 (4 years ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed1000 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4257.6
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2020 8 August 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 423.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V520 and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V520 or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.