Pro V520 vs Pro W6800
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
Competitors of Radeon Pro V520 from NVIDIA
It seems that there's no NVIDIA equivalent for Radeon Pro V520. The nearest candidate is Quadro RTX 4000, however, it's 0% faster and higher by 0 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro V520:
Competitors of Radeon Pro W6800 from NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro W6800 from NVIDIA is Quadro RTX 5000, which is slower by 7% and lower by 12 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro W6800:
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro V520
Wider memory bus (2048 vs 256 bit)
Lower power consumption (225W vs 250W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Somewhat newer (8 June 2021 vs 1 December 2020)
More pipelines (3840 vs 2304)
So, which one is the better GPU?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon Pro V520 and AMD Radeon Pro W6800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.