Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Pro V340 MxGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU with Radeon RX Vega 9, including specs and performance data.

Pro V340 MxGPU
2018
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
6.82
+34.5%

Pro V340 MxGPU outperforms RX Vega 9 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro V340 MxGPU Pro V340 MxGPU
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking598678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7526.03
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 August 2018 (7 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×2576
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs224 ×2no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Pro V340 MxGPU and RX Vega 9 compete in popular games:

  • Pro V340 MxGPU is 33% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.82 5.07
Recency 26 August 2018 26 October 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Pro V340 MxGPU has a 34.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

RX Vega 9, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 9 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
RTX 2050 Max-Q 2050 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 20 Vega 20
RX Vega 20 AMD RX Vega 20
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX Vega 20 Vega 20
vs
RX 9070 XT 9070 XT
RX Vega 20 Vega 20
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16 GB
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
RX 580G 580G
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
RX Vega 2 Vega 2
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
RX Vega 5 Vega 5
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
G550 PCIe
Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Pro V340 MxGPU
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile A5000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.