Radeon Pro V520 vs Pro V340 MxGPU

Place in the ranking	534	174
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.69	9.70
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Navi 12
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 August 2018 (6 years ago)	1 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2304
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1600 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	230.4
Floating-point processing power	10.75 TFLOPS	7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	224	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro V340 MxGPU 7.40

Pro V520 31.80
+330%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro V340 MxGPU 2853

Pro V520 12257
+330%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.40	31.80
Recency	26 August 2018	1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	225 Watt

Pro V340 MxGPU has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has a 329.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro V520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.