Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs Radeon Pro V320

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date29 June 2017 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844608
Core clock speed852 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0449.3
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS14.38 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs224288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 260 Watt

Pro V320 has 13% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.