GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.76no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP104G94
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179264
Core clock speed1328 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate172.819.20
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 21 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

Quadro P3200 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P3200 and GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition
GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 329 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.