GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Radeon Pro SSG
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 249 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.50 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.77 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Fiji | GT218 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 July 2016 (9 years ago) | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 520 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,900 million | 260 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 268.8 | 4.160 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.602 TFLOPS | 0.03936 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 256 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 July 2016 | 12 October 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 260 Watt | 31 Watt |
Pro SSG has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 739% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro SSG and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro SSG is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
