Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon Pro Duo

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCapsaicinGT218
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $169
Current price$4200 (2.8x MSRP)$92 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate256.04.400
Floating-point performance2x 8,192 gflops44 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length277 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity1no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.04.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Duo 8164
+6592%
FX 380 LP 122

Radeon Pro Duo outperforms Quadro FX 380 LP by 6592% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2016 1 December 2009
Cost $1499 $169
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 28 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo and Quadro FX 380 LP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Quadro FX 380 LP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3621 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.