Arc B370 vs Radeon Pro Duo
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 310 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.97 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.36 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Xe3-LPG (2026) |
| GPU code name | Capsaicin | Panther Lake |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 26 April 2016 (9 years ago) | 27 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 ×2 | 1280 |
| Compute units | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 256.0 ×2 | 96.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 20 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2 | 40 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 10 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 640 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 277 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit ×2 | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s ×2 | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DisplayPort support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| CrossFire | + | - |
| Enduro | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| LiquidVR | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TressFX | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.9 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.4 |
| Mantle | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 April 2016 | 27 January 2026 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
Arc B370 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo is a workstation graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
