Arc B370 vs FirePro S9300 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameCapsaicinPanther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 March 2016 (10 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×21280
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6 ×296.00
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS ×26.144 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×220
TMUs256 ×240
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cache1 MB640 KB
L2 Cache2 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

Arc B370 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9300 X2 or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.