Radeon R7 A360 vs Pro Duo Polaris
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1025 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Meso |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 ×2 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1125 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 ×2 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.728 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 8 |
| TMUs | 144 ×2 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 305 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB ×2 | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit ×2 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s ×2 | 14.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pro Duo Polaris has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and Radeon R7 A360. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
