Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro V7900 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCaymanEllesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304 ×2
Core clock speed725 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)224 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs80144 ×2
L1 Cache320 KB576 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x SDI1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 224 Watt 250 Watt

V7900 SDI has 11.6% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7900 SDI and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 SDI or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.