Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro 580

Place in performance ranking	258	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.09	21.72
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	DG2-512
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$289
Current price	$5999	$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 1893% better value for money than Pro 580.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	3584
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	537.6
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 580 and Arc A750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	217.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 580 20.07

Arc A750 43.84
+118%

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro 580 by 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 580 7753

Arc A750 11953
+54.2%

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro 580 by 54% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −127%	102 +127%
1440p	27−30 −126%	61 +126%
4K	16−18 −131%	37 +131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −130%	62 +130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −125%	90 +125%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −133%	140−150 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −120%	85−90 +120%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −130%	90−95 +130%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −138%	100−110 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −124%	112 +124%
Hitman 3	40−45 −125%	90−95 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −129%	195 +129%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −122%	144 +122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −127%	100−110 +127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −119%	285 +119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −140%	96 +140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −129%	55 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −153%	76 +153%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −133%	140−150 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −120%	85−90 +120%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −130%	90−95 +130%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −138%	100−110 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −129%	160−170 +129%
Hitman 3	40−45 −125%	90−95 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −124%	170−180 +124%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −131%	127 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −127%	100−110 +127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −139%	239 +139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −131%	185 +131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −131%	100−110 +131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −150%	45 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −130%	69 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −120%	85−90 +120%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −130%	90−95 +130%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −125%	90 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −126%	113 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −121%	199 +121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −130%	69 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −133%	63 +133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−127%

100−110

+127%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −146%	85−90 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −133%	128 +133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −138%	38 +138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −125%	54 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −127%	65−70 +127%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −153%	76 +153%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −126%	79 +126%
Hitman 3	24−27 −142%	55−60 +142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −130%	92 +130%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −146%	86 +146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −123%	145 +123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −138%	57 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −138%	50 +138%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−153%

75−80
+153%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −138%	35−40 +138%
Hitman 3	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −138%	55−60 +138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −144%	44 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −130%	69 +130%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −133%	28 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −142%	27−30 +142%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −126%	61 +126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −142%	58 +142%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −148%	52 +148%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −150%	30 +150%