Radeon 780M vs Pro 575
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 284 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 85 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | Polaris 20 | Phoenix |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 (6 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $448 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 25,390 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 140.3 | 139.2 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 575 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 June 2017 | 5 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 54 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
