GeForce FX 5900 vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5700 with GeForce FX 5900, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5700
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
27.39
+34138%

Pro 5700 outperforms FX 5900 by a whopping 34138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2381530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.17no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 10NV35
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)12 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate194.43.200
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1448
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s27.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5700 27.39
+34138%
FX 5900 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5700 11456
+33594%
Samples: 6
FX 5900 34
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.39 0.08
Recency 4 August 2020 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm

Pro 5700 has a 34137.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 or GeForce FX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.