Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs Pro 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 570 with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), including specs and performance data.

Pro 570
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
16.41
+265%

Pro 570 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308621
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 20Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$356 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1105 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate123.8no data
Floating-point performance3,584 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 570 and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6780 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+242%
19
−242%
4K40−45
+264%
11
−264%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+271%
7−8
−271%
Hitman 3 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Metro Exodus 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+300%
3−4
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Metro Exodus 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
+293%
14−16
−293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how Pro 570 and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

  • Pro 570 is 242% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 570 is 264% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.41 4.50
Recency 5 June 2017 26 October 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon Pro 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 51 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1216 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.