GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 570

Place in performance ranking	308	216
Place by popularity	not in top-100	44
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.97	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	Ampere GA106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$356	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2560
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1552 MHz
Boost clock speed	1105 MHz	1777 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.8	102.0
Floating-point performance	3,584 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 570 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit Bit
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	217.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 570 16.41

RTX 3050 Mobile 23.62
+43.9%

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 570 by 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 570 6336

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+44%

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 570 by 44% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 −55%	93 +55%
1440p	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
4K	21−24 −47.6%	31 +47.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

70−75
−51.4%

106

+51.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −50%	75 +50%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −56%	75−80 +56%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −60%	45−50 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −50.9%	83 +50.9%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Hitman 3	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −47.9%	207 +47.9%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −54%	75−80 +54%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −57.5%	60−65 +57.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −56%	156 +56%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −54.5%	85 +54.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −55%	62 +55%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −56%	75−80 +56%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −60%	45−50 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −52.5%	61 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −55%	60−65 +55%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Hitman 3	24−27 −45.8%	35 +45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −55%	90−95 +55%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −45.7%	51 +45.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −57.5%	60−65 +57.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −44.7%	123 +44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −52.7%	168 +52.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −51.1%	65−70 +51.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −60%	45−50 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −52.5%	61 +52.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −48.6%	100−110 +48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −52.9%	107 +52.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −51.4%	106 +51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −44.4%	65 +44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −57.8%	71 +57.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−57.5%

60−65
+57.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −63.3%	45−50 +63.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −48.1%	40 +48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −66.7%	30 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −51.1%	68 +51.1%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Hitman 3	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −56%	78 +56%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −56%	78 +56%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −57.1%	33 +57.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−44.4%

35−40
+44.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Hitman 3	21−24 −61.9%	34 +61.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −50%	27−30 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −66.7%	30 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −46.7%	44 +46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −50%	24 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −46.7%	44 +46.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −54.2%	37 +54.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −58.3%	19 +58.3%