ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5351603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code namePolaris 21RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2018 (7 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1004 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate64.261.000
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+183750%
Samples: 2
ATI 9200 LE 2
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41no data
1440p43no data
4K17no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 43 no data
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 37 no data
Fortnite 66 no data
Forza Horizon 4 53 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 36 no data
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Dota 2 71 no data
Far Cry 5 33 no data
Fortnite 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 33 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 33 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Dota 2 69 no data
Far Cry 5 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 36 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Valorant 26 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 32 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 57 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 13 no data
Metro Exodus 7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2018 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

Pro 560X has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 168% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 208 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.