ATI Graphics Wonder VLB vs Radeon Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking533not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code namePolaris 21Mach32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2018 (7 years ago)1992 (34 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1004 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm700 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate64.26no data
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8VLB
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s80 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 700 nm

Pro 560X has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560X and Graphics Wonder VLB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Wonder VLB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
ATI Graphics Wonder VLB
Graphics Wonder VLB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 207 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics Wonder VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or Graphics Wonder VLB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.