GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 560X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 21GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (7 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243840
Core clock speed1004 MHz817 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1282 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate64.26153.8
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS9.846 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs64120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache256 KB3.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2018 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3060 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 206 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 189 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.