UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with UHD Graphics 710, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
22.28
+747%

Pro 5600M outperforms Graphics 710 by a whopping 747% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking282852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.2213.47
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 12Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate164.810.40
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs1608
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed770 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5600M 22.28
+747%
UHD Graphics 710 2.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9324
+748%
Samples: 29
UHD Graphics 710 1100

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+821%
14−16
−821%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+821%
14−16
−821%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Fortnite 110−120
+850%
12−14
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+800%
8−9
−800%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%
Valorant 160−170
+789%
18−20
−789%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+821%
14−16
−821%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+830%
27−30
−830%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Dota 2 110−120
+750%
14−16
−750%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Fortnite 110−120
+850%
12−14
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+800%
8−9
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Valorant 160−170
+789%
18−20
−789%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Dota 2 110−120
+750%
14−16
−750%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+810%
10−11
−810%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Valorant 160−170
+789%
18−20
−789%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+850%
12−14
−850%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+800%
18−20
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+867%
18−20
−867%
Valorant 190−200
+843%
21−24
−843%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+814%
7−8
−814%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+767%
6−7
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+867%
6−7
−867%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Valorant 130−140
+843%
14−16
−843%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Dota 2 75−80
+850%
8−9
−850%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.28 2.63
Recency 15 June 2020 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 747.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 83 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 140 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or UHD Graphics 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.