Radeon Pro W6400 vs Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
22.14
+15.4%

Pro 5600M outperforms Pro W6400 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking271301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.7329.22
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 12Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date15 June 2020 (5 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1000 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8111.9
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5600M 22.14
+15.4%
Pro W6400 19.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9278
+15.4%
Pro W6400 8037

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Fortnite 110−120
+20%
95−100
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Valorant 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+19.5%
210−220
−19.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Fortnite 110−120
+20%
95−100
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Valorant 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Sons of the Forest 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+20%
55−60
−20%
Valorant 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+20%
95−100
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+23.8%
130−140
−23.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16%
150−160
−16%
Valorant 190−200
+15.9%
170−180
−15.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Sons of the Forest 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Valorant 130−140
+19.1%
110−120
−19.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.14 19.18
Recency 15 June 2020 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

Pro 5600M has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.