RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Place in the ranking	232	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	33.08	54.08
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 12	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	15 June 2020 (4 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	6144
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	164.8	299.5
Floating-point processing power	5.274 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	160	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 23.93

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.76
+129%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 21126
+129%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−118%

85−90
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −118%	170−180 +118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −122%	140−150 +122%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −113%	300−310 +113%
Hitman 3	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −125%	250−260 +125%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −120%	180−190 +120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −122%	140−150 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −122%	180−190 +122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −128%	230−240 +128%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −118%	170−180 +118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −122%	140−150 +122%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −113%	300−310 +113%
Hitman 3	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −125%	250−260 +125%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −120%	180−190 +120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −122%	140−150 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −122%	180−190 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −128%	230−240 +128%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −113%	300−310 +113%
Hitman 3	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −125%	250−260 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −122%	180−190 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −128%	230−240 +128%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−122%

140−150

+122%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −122%	80−85 +122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −122%	60−65 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −121%	300−310 +121%
Hitman 3	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −112%	110−120 +112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −124%	65−70 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −121%	300−310 +121%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−125%

90−95
+125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Hitman 3	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −128%	280−290 +128%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −122%	60−65 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −127%	75−80 +127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −124%	65−70 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−114%

45−50
+114%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.93	54.76
Recency	15 June 2020	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt

Pro 5600M has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 128.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.