CMP 30HX vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
24.01
+13.5%

Pro 5600M outperforms CMP 30HX by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking235262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.19
Power efficiency33.0411.65
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 12TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601408
Core clock speed1000 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8157.1
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 24.01
+13.5%
CMP 30HX 21.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
+13.5%
CMP 30HX 8135

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Elden Ring 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.6%
90−95
−15.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Valorant 95−100
+14.1%
85−90
−14.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Dota 2 80−85
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Elden Ring 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+15.4%
65−70
−15.4%
Fortnite 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.6%
90−95
−15.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+17.7%
130−140
−17.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Valorant 95−100
+14.1%
85−90
−14.1%
World of Tanks 250−260
+15.5%
220−230
−15.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Dota 2 80−85
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+15.4%
65−70
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+15.6%
90−95
−15.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+17.7%
130−140
−17.7%
Valorant 95−100
+14.1%
85−90
−14.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Elden Ring 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
World of Tanks 160−170
+14.3%
140−150
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Valorant 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Dota 2 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Elden Ring 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Dota 2 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Fortnite 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Valorant 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.01 21.16
Recency 15 June 2020 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 125 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 30HX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 31 vote

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.