Arc 130T Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking243not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.93no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 12Arrow Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8123.2
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs6428
TMUs16056
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed770 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2020 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 130T Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Arc 130T Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.