UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon Pro 555X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.

Pro 555X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.38
+266%

Pro 555X outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking500849
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 21Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed907 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.54no data
Floating-point processing power1.393 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1275 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+233%
12
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Hitman 3 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+153%
18−20
−153%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+61.1%
35−40
−61.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Hitman 3 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+153%
18−20
−153%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+155%
11
−155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+61.1%
35−40
−61.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Hitman 3 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+153%
18−20
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+100%
14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+380%
5
−380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+61.1%
35−40
−61.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Hitman 3 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+308%
12−14
−308%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how Pro 555X and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • Pro 555X is 233% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 555X is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 555X surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 2.29
Recency 16 July 2018 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Pro 555X has a 265.9% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 555X is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 165 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 360 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.