GeForce 210 vs Radeon Pro 555X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 555X with GeForce 210, including specs and performance data.

Pro 555X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.42
+2616%

Pro 555X outperforms 210 by a whopping 2616% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5071329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.730.69
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 21GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed907 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate43.544.160
Floating-point processing power1.393 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s8.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 555X 8.42
+2616%
GeForce 210 0.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 555X 3235
+2618%
GeForce 210 119

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Fortnite 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Valorant 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
World of Tanks 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Valorant 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
World of Tanks 60−65
+2950%
2−3
−2950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Fortnite 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Valorant 8−9 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.42 0.31
Recency 16 July 2018 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

Pro 555X has a 2616.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 210, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 555X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 210 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 171 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3715 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.