RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5500M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5500M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5500M
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
16.07

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro 5500M by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.4036.54
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15367424
Core clock speed1000 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2386.3
Floating-point processing power4.454 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs96232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5500M 16.07
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.76
+228%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5500M 6736
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 22111
+228%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 5500M 14725
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 54921
+273%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 5500M 10399
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+286%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 5500M 65776
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 152418
+132%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 5500M 3364
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 16308
+385%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−216%
180−190
+216%
1440p59
−222%
190−200
+222%
4K32
−213%
100−110
+213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−223%
300−310
+223%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
God of War 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 76
−216%
240−250
+216%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−223%
300−310
+223%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−221%
170−180
+221%
Fortnite 90−95
−222%
290−300
+222%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Forza Horizon 5 31
−223%
100−105
+223%
God of War 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−228%
200−210
+228%
Valorant 130−140
−208%
400−450
+208%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 62
−223%
200−210
+223%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−223%
300−310
+223%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 208
−213%
650−700
+213%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Dota 2 111
−215%
350−400
+215%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−221%
170−180
+221%
Fortnite 90−95
−222%
290−300
+222%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−214%
160−170
+214%
God of War 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
−219%
220−230
+219%
Metro Exodus 37
−224%
120−130
+224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−228%
200−210
+228%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−224%
220−230
+224%
Valorant 130−140
−208%
400−450
+208%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
−222%
190−200
+222%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Dota 2 107
−227%
350−400
+227%
Far Cry 5 55
−227%
180−190
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
God of War 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−228%
200−210
+228%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−208%
120−130
+208%
Valorant 28
−221%
90−95
+221%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−222%
290−300
+222%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 118
−197%
350−400
+197%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−214%
110−120
+214%
Metro Exodus 22
−218%
70−75
+218%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 107
−227%
350−400
+227%
Valorant 160−170
−209%
500−550
+209%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−219%
150−160
+219%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Far Cry 5 40
−225%
130−140
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%
God of War 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−224%
120−130
+224%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 71
−224%
230−240
+224%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−220%
80−85
+220%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%
Valorant 90−95
−219%
290−300
+219%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Dota 2 54
−215%
170−180
+215%
Far Cry 5 20
−225%
65−70
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
God of War 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%

This is how Pro 5500M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 216% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 222% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is 213% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.07 52.76
Recency 13 November 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 110 Watt

Pro 5500M has 29.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 228.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 300 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 31 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500M or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.