RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5500 XT and RTX 2000 Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5500 XT
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
18.81

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Pro 5500 XT by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.39
Power efficiency11.4644.47
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14AD107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362816
Core clock speed1187 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1757 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate168.7187.4
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs9688
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5500 XT 18.81
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 40.86
+117%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5500 XT 7881
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17122
+117%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.81 40.86
Recency 4 August 2020 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 117.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5500 XT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 69 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500 XT or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.