UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon Pro 5300
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 287 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 80 |
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | Navi 14 | Raptor Lake GT1 |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 192 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1550 MHz |
Number of transistors | 6,400 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 | 18.60 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |
Width | IGP | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 14 GB/s | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Motherboard Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 August 2020 | 3 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 15 Watt |
Pro 5300 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 466.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and UHD Graphics 730. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.