GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.40no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 14GT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)12 March 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128016
Core clock speed1000 MHz589 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate132.04.712
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s5.328 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 12 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300 or GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.