Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated351
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.40
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed589 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors260 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate4.712132.0
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 85 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has 70% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.