Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Pro 460

Place in the ranking	489	168
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.70	17.34
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Baffin	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	907 MHz	1499 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.05	239.8
Floating-point processing power	1.858 TFLOPS	7.675 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	64	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 460 8.98

Pro 5700 XT 32.68
+264%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 460 3452

Pro 5700 XT 12567
+264%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−242%

130−140
+242%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Elden Ring	24−27 −260%	90−95 +260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −261%	130−140 +261%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
Valorant	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Dota 2	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Elden Ring	24−27 −260%	90−95 +260%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −242%	130−140 +242%
Fortnite	50−55 −258%	190−200 +258%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −261%	130−140 +261%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −257%	250−260 +257%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −254%	85−90 +254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −252%	95−100 +252%
Valorant	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
World of Tanks	130−140 −241%	450−500 +241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −245%	100−105 +245%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −261%	65−70 +261%
Dota 2	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −242%	130−140 +242%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −261%	130−140 +261%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −257%	250−260 +257%
Valorant	30−35 −244%	110−120 +244%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Elden Ring	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −249%	150−160 +249%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
World of Tanks	65−70 −254%	230−240 +254%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −253%	60−65 +253%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Valorant	21−24 −264%	80−85 +264%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Dota 2	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Elden Ring	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −246%	90−95 +246%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Dota 2	18−20 −242%	65−70 +242%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Fortnite	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Valorant	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

This is how Pro 460 and Pro 5700 XT compete in popular games:

Pro 5700 XT is 242% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.98	32.68
Recency	30 October 2016	4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	130 Watt

Pro 460 has 271.4% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 263.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.