Quadro 2000D vs Radeon Pro 455

Place in the ranking	518	830
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.16
Power efficiency	15.91	2.82
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Baffin	GF106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	5 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	192
Core clock speed	855 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	62 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.04	20.00
Floating-point processing power	1.313 TFLOPS	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	48	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	178 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	650 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 455 8.09
+219%

Quadro 2000D 2.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 455 3112
+218%

Quadro 2000D 978

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	33 +230%	10−12 −230%
4K	22 +267%	6−7 −267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	59.90
4K	no data	99.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Elden Ring	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +220%	10−11 −220%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Valorant	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Dota 2	38 +280%	10−11 −280%
Elden Ring	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Fortnite	45−50 +243%	14−16 −243%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +220%	10−11 −220%
Grand Theft Auto V	24 +243%	7−8 −243%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +256%	18−20 −256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Valorant	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
World of Tanks	145 +222%	45−50 −222%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Dota 2	62 +244%	18−20 −244%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +220%	10−11 −220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +256%	18−20 −256%
Valorant	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Elden Ring	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
World of Tanks	55−60 +222%	18−20 −222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Valorant	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Elden Ring	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +229%	7−8 −229%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	23 +229%	7−8 −229%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Fortnite	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Valorant	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

This is how Pro 455 and Quadro 2000D compete in popular games:

Pro 455 is 230% faster in 1080p
Pro 455 is 267% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.09	2.54
Recency	30 October 2016	5 October 2011
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	62 Watt

Pro 455 has a 218.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 77.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 455 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro 2000D is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.