A10G vs Radeon Pro 455

Place in the ranking	516	68
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.81	22.19
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	GA102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	9216
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.04	492.5
Floating-point processing power	1.313 TFLOPS	31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	48	288
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	600.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 455 8.08

A10G 48.59
+501%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 455 3112

A10G 18723
+502%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	33 −476%	190−200 +476%
4K	23 −465%	130−140 +465%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−477%

75−80
+477%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −465%	130−140 +465%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −456%	300−310 +456%
Hitman 3	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −487%	270−280 +487%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −493%	160−170 +493%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −465%	130−140 +465%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −456%	300−310 +456%
Hitman 3	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −487%	270−280 +487%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −493%	160−170 +493%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −465%	130−140 +465%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −456%	300−310 +456%
Hitman 3	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −487%	270−280 +487%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −493%	160−170 +493%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −471%	80−85 +471%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −426%	300−310 +426%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
−491%

130−140

+491%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −494%	190−200 +494%
Hitman 3	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −488%	100−105 +488%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−471%

80−85
+471%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Hitman 3	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −486%	170−180 +486%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −456%	50−55 +456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−463%

45−50

+463%

This is how Pro 455 and A10G compete in popular games:

A10G is 476% faster in 1080p
A10G is 465% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.08	48.59
Recency	30 October 2016	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt

Pro 455 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 501.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 455 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 455 is a mobile workstation card while A10G is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.