GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 450 with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Pro 450
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
6.51

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Pro 450 by a whopping 731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61860
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data80.80
Power efficiency14.3226.05
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBaffinAD106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date30 October 2016 (9 years ago)18 May 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404352
Core clock speed800 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2535 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00344.8
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs40136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache160 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 450 6.51
RTX 4060 Ti 54.12
+731%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 450 2722
Samples: 3
RTX 4060 Ti 22611
+731%
Samples: 13979

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−721%
230−240
+721%
4K19
−689%
150−160
+689%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.73
4Kno data2.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−713%
260−270
+713%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−713%
260−270
+713%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Fortnite 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Valorant 70−75
−722%
600−650
+722%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−713%
260−270
+713%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−687%
850−900
+687%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Dota 2 50−55
−669%
400−450
+669%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Fortnite 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−726%
190−200
+726%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−700%
160−170
+700%
Valorant 70−75
−722%
600−650
+722%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−721%
230−240
+721%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Dota 2 67
−721%
550−600
+721%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−700%
240−250
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Valorant 70−75
−722%
600−650
+722%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Valorant 70−75
−711%
600−650
+711%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Valorant 30−35
−718%
270−280
+718%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dota 2 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

This is how Pro 450 and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Ti is 721% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Ti is 689% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.51 54.12
Recency 30 October 2016 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 160 Watt

Pro 450 has 357% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 731% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 13057 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 450 or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.