Tesla S2050 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.76no data
Power efficiency9.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $11,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096448 ×4
Core clock speed1200 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate384.032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs6448 ×4
TMUs25656 ×4
L1 Cache1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache4 MB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed945 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 900 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 291.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.