Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.98no data
Power efficiency9.75no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)12 June 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096256
Core clock speed1200 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate384.015.20
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25632
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1792 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s89.86 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 12 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1792 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 142 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

4000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 62% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Quadro 4000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Quadro 4000 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.