Radeon R9 Fury vs PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with Radeon R9 Fury, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017, $1,599
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
29.15
+28.6%

PRO 9100 outperforms R9 Fury by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO WX 9100 PRO WX 9100
R9 Fury R9 Fury

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.007.04
Power efficiency9.776.35
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10Fiji
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)10 July 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

R9 Fury has 76% better value for money than PRO WX 9100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584
Compute unitsno data56
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0224.0
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256224
L1 Cache1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin​2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s512 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.125+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 9100 29.15
+28.6%
R9 Fury 22.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12249
+28.7%
Samples: 114
R9 Fury 9521
Samples: 448

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+22.2%
90
−22.2%
1440p130−140
+22.6%
106
−22.6%
4K60−65
+25%
48
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.54
−138%
6.10
+138%
1440p12.30
−137%
5.18
+137%
4K26.65
−133%
11.44
+133%
  • R9 Fury has 138% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 Fury has 137% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R9 Fury has 133% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 268
+0%
268
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+0%
91
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 158
+0%
158
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 109
+0%
109
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 47
+0%
47
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%

This is how PRO WX 9100 and R9 Fury compete in popular games:

  • PRO WX 9100 is 22% faster in 1080p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 23% faster in 1440p
  • PRO WX 9100 is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.15 22.66
Recency 10 July 2017 10 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 275 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 19.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Fury in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
R9 Fury Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
A800 SXM4 80 GB A800 SXM4 80 GB
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
GT 710 PCI GeForce GT 710 PCI
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8100
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
RX 5300 XT Radeon RX 5300 XT
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
RX 5300 XT OEM RX 5300 XT OEM
vs
RX 560D RX 560D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 34 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 190 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Radeon R9 Fury, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.