Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Quadro RTX 8000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO WX 9100
2017
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
32.08

RTX 8000 outperforms PRO WX 9100 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.941.90
Power efficiency9.5613.19
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 9100 has 476% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964608
Core clock speed1200 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0509.8
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs256288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 32.08
RTX 8000 50.03
+56%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 9100 12361
RTX 8000 19278
+56%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 65451
RTX 8000 147346
+125%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

PRO WX 9100 67893
RTX 8000 122427
+80.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.08 50.03
Recency 10 July 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 260 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has 13% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 56% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 9100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.