Quadro P620 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Place in performance ranking	158	439
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.28	21.31
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 July 2017 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,599	no data
Current price	$1880 (1.2x MSRP)	$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 157% better value for money than PRO WX 9100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	512
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	384.0	43.33
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 32.27
+243%

Quadro P620 9.41

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms Quadro P620 by 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO WX 9100 12464
+243%

Quadro P620 3633

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms Quadro P620 by 243% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

PRO WX 9100 64683
+446%

Quadro P620 11849

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms Quadro P620 by 446% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO WX 9100 67932
+505%

Quadro P620 11228

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms Quadro P620 by 505% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

180−190
+227%

−227%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

+275%

4−5
−275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +283%	12−14 −283%
Hitman 3	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Metro Exodus	35 +250%	10−11 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +278%	9−10 −278%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +283%	12−14 −283%
Hitman 3	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Metro Exodus	13 +333%	3−4 −333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +256%	9−10 −256%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +278%	9−10 −278%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +283%	12−14 −283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +278%	9−10 −278%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+271%

7−8
−271%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Hitman 3	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1